Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Joe 6-pack

Looks like Angela Corey wants to be a defendant in a wrongful termination lawsuit.

I would take a guess his work performance reviews do not match his “poor performance” the letter cited.


6 posted on 07/12/2013 9:47:06 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Secret Agent Man
Looks like Angela Corey wants to be a defendant in a wrongful termination lawsuit.

That would be interesting.

10 posted on 07/12/2013 9:50:12 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Secret Agent Man
Looks like Angela Corey wants to be a defendant in a wrongful termination lawsuit.

I would take a guess his work performance reviews do not match his “poor performance” the letter cited.

From a full reading of the article, Corey's office was evidently consumed by paranoia.

I counted at least four other former employees, aside from Kruidbos, dismissed for being "untrustworthy", or some variant thereof.

It doesn't sound like a pleasant place to work...and Angela Corey doesn't sound like a very good person (unless, evidently, you're Bernie de la Rionda).

28 posted on 07/12/2013 10:17:36 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Secret Agent Man

It’s a weak IT Director who doesn’t keep his own ammo in a political office. I’m just saying...


70 posted on 07/13/2013 5:33:58 AM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Secret Agent Man

it gets better, Florida has a whistle-blower act and it is pretty strong. Not sure section one applies, but section 2 and 3 do.

See § 448.102-.103. Section 448.102 prohibits employers from taking three types of retaliatory personnel action:
An employer may not take any retaliatory personnel action against an employee because the employee has:
(1) Disclosed, or threatened to disclose, to any appropriate governmental agency, under oath, in writing, an activity, policy, or practice of the employer that is in violation of a law, rule, or regulation. However, this subsection does not apply unless the employee has, in writing,
brought the activity, policy, or practice to the attention of a supervisor or the employer and has afforded the employer a reasonable opportunity to correct the activity, policy, or practice.
(2) Provided information to, or testified before, any appropriate governmental agency, person, or entity conducting an investigation, hearing, or inquiry into an alleged violation of a law, rule, or regulation by the employer.
(3) Objected to, or refused to participate in, any activity, policy, or practice of the employer which is in violation of a law, rule, or regulation.


75 posted on 07/13/2013 7:07:22 AM PDT by ClayinVA ("Those who don't remember history are doomed to repeat it")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Secret Agent Man
.


Not in Florida ...


.
77 posted on 07/13/2013 7:23:50 AM PDT by Patton@Bastogne (Swine Piss be upon the Sodmite Obama, and his Child-Rapist False Prophet Mohammed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Secret Agent Man

Before Kruidbos’ name surfaced in the Martin trial proceedings, he received a pay raise for “meritorious performance,” according to a document dated May 16 in his personnel file. Quoted from “Jacksonville.com”.


95 posted on 07/13/2013 12:21:02 PM PDT by Ozark Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson