Since then U.S. troops have deployed to multiple fronts to fight a determined enemy. The Global War on Terror has cost the lives of around 7,000 men and women.
The Rules of Engagement the men and women of the Armed Forces are under are very stringent. Any question of veracity in the use of force - an investigation is lost. The accused stands to lose everything they every worked for and to rot in a military prison.
These are men and women fighting in war zones.
Yet, here on U.S. soil, the "law enforcement officers" that are allegedly here to "serve and protect" are able to violate Constitutional Rights - conduct searches without probable cause or warrant, destroy property, cause fear and pandemonium, kill innocent pets and family members with impunity.
Why is it that LEOs in America have less restrictive ROEs than U.S. troops in a war zone against suicidal jihadis?
Why is it that lethal force is granted carte blanche against civilians without repercussion, yet beyond any doubt and near their own detriment, U.S. troops are only allowed lethal force as a very last resort?
Now citizen, ask yourself who is the bigger enemy - jihadis hell bent on the destruction of theUnited States, or you?
What is it, with you Va/rgina boys, that can never ask the right question?