Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: moehoward
Great post. But what about the authentication issue.

I agree about the post.

And that's a really good question because 1) the data must be authenticated to be any good at all and 2) without it the Defense is burned through no fault of their own, but by the perfidy of the prosecutors and the "judge." I don't see how this train can be stopped with a sequestered Jury standing by. A slow-motion Reversible Error in progress. Does anybody think she'll declare a mistrial because of her own actions? Can another judge step in and do it?

Like anything else a liberal does, she's going to just shove this off on somebody else to deal with, in this case the Jury. She'll find against almost (if not all) the Defense proffers argued today. She'll probably admonish West for good measure, for calling the prosecutors "liars." Let the chips fall where they may. We will freak out. Someone will blame Don West's ice cream habits.

If the Jury finds Zimmerman not Guilty, then it's over for her. There will be riot trouble in somebody elses neighborhood, she'll be threatened but it will die down. If they find him Guilty, she has made so many Errors it's guaranteed to end up back in somebody elses courtroom.

157 posted on 07/09/2013 9:15:13 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (I am a dissident. Will you join me? My name is John....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]


To: Cyber Liberty

I don’t know. She looked conflicted to me during the video hearing. Disconnected during the pros rambling to the point of cutting them off, to ask MoM questions.

I think there’s a very good chance the video will be seen by the jury. It appeared the main issue with the video was the part showing TM striking GZ because there had been no clear testimony whether it was left handed or right. IMO it’s equally effective with that removed.


218 posted on 07/09/2013 10:30:56 PM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]

To: Cyber Liberty

Regarding the texts. Some attorneys are arguing unless there’s some clear evidence the device has been used by multiple parties, what’s on it or produced by it, is the owners. I’m betting there’s ample precedent supporting this argument.


221 posted on 07/09/2013 10:44:44 PM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson