Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hypocrites and Bullies Speak on "The Importance of Trust"; Bullies, Bribes, and Foreign Aid
Townhall.com ^ | July 8, 2013 | Mike Shedlock

Posted on 07/08/2013 7:24:05 AM PDT by Kaslin

The bullies and hypocrites took to the air waves today regarding the "Importance of Trust".

For example, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff complained today Snowden’s disclosures have undermined ‘importance of trust’ with other countries.

The Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman says NSA leaker Edward Snowden’s disclosures about U.S. surveillance programs have undermined U.S. relationships with other countries and affected what he calls “the importance of trust.”

Gen. Martin Dempsey told CNN’s “State of the Union” in an interview broadcast Sunday that the U.S. will “work our way back. But it has set us back temporarily.”

The head of the House Intelligence Committee, Rep. Mike Rogers, told he “absolutely” thinks that one of the countries will give Snowden travel documents.

Rogers, R-Mich., said the U.S. should look at trade agreements with the nations that are offering asylum “to send a very clear message that we won’t put up with this kind of behavior.”

Sen. Robert Menendez, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said he wasn’t surprised that those nations were offering asylum. “They like sticking it to the United States,” Mendendez, D-N.J., told NBC’s “Meet the Press.”

He also mentioned re-examining U.S. trade policies and foreign aid to any country that might take in Snowden.

“Clearly such acceptance of Snowden to any country ... is going to put them directly against the United States, and they need to know that,” he said.
Hypocrites and Bullies

  1. Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff 
  2. Rep. Mike Rogers, Head of the House Intelligence Committee,
  3. Sen. Robert Menendez, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee

I would like to point out to all three gentlemen one important fact: Edward Snowden did not undermine trust.

There was no trust to undermine. All Snowden did was prove the obvious.

If there was any trust the US would not have been bugging the offices of the EU and Germany. If there was any trust, France would not be spying on us.

Bullies, Bribes, and Foreign Aid

Please note the bullying by US imperialists. Rep. Mike Rogers (R) proposes “to send a very clear message that we won’t put up with this kind of behavior.

Excuse Me! What about unconscionable spying by the US on its alleged allies?

Countries should send a very clear message to the US that they will not put up with our severely misguided imperialism. And they probably would except they fear the US might cut off aid.

If you are looking for a reason very few countries have offered Snowden asylum (see Venezuela, Nicaragua offer asylum to Snowden; Double Standards and Hypocrite Allies), you now have an answer.

Thus, we can all thank Rogers for explaining that US foreign aid is really nothing but bribery so the  imperialists, war-mongers, and hypocrites can continue their ways with impunity, totally clueless they are the ones directly responsible for the undermined trust.



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: foreignaid; mikeshedlock; nsascandal; spying

1 posted on 07/08/2013 7:24:05 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Obama’s executive order changing ObamaCare’s startup date for corporations until after the elections next year has vividly shown any but the most gullible RINOs in the Senate and House that they can’t trust him to follow any immigration law they might pass.

That’s the issue of trust the lapdog media will not touch, and it should affect every bill proposed in Congress.


2 posted on 07/08/2013 7:34:02 AM PDT by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txrefugee

They sure don’t seem to mind violating our trust


3 posted on 07/08/2013 8:07:44 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The author makes great points, but seems a little turned around on these points:

“Excuse Me! What about unconscionable spying by the US on its alleged allies?”

Other countries or their citizens do not have 4th Amendment protection. Given our long history of suffering sneak attacks, the US would be remiss if we did not spy on other countries. Conscience does not enter it in the least. Like our allies DON’T spy on us? American citizens, on the other hand, are protected by the 4th Amendment. That’s the crime.

“Thus, we can all thank Rogers for explaining that US foreign aid is really nothing but bribery...”

Only for the last 6,000+ years of human history.


4 posted on 07/08/2013 1:05:53 PM PDT by Owl558 (Those who remember George Santayana are doomed to repeat him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson