Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did Abolitionist Hatred of the South Cause the Civil War?
PJ Lifestyle ^ | July 5, 2013 | David Forsmark

Posted on 07/06/2013 7:37:16 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 461 next last
To: JCBreckenridge

I knew you wouldn’t be able to comprehend the import of that 41%. Sad really.

It doesn’t matter much what the percentage of the vote went to the dhimmicrat in Washington state - I make no claims about the liberal infestation here. But if you can’t see how seriously in trouble Texas is by virtue of the dhimmi vote then your insipid gibe at BroJoeK about voting for Øbongo makes you look like an idiot.

Here, perhaps this will help: ALMOST....AS MANY....TEXANS....VOTED....FOR....ØBONGO....AS FOR....THE OTHER GUY.

Is that a bit clearer?


201 posted on 07/06/2013 10:06:54 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: TBP

The war was started by the slave power as it existed in 1860. They had many faults but abolitionism is not one that I have ever heard them accused of.

They could also not be accused of supporting the tariff of abominations, which was passed back in about 1830, unless you have evidence of a time machine.


202 posted on 07/06/2013 10:08:19 PM PDT by donmeaker (Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker

God had no part in those actions, right?


203 posted on 07/06/2013 10:08:52 PM PDT by RedHeeler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge
JCBreckenridge: "States, thanks to Lincoln, are not free to leave.
Despite the fact that the Constitution says they can. Freely entered, freely they may go."

By your own oft-repeated standard, states are still free to leave the same way they entered meaning with the approval of Congress.

It was true then, it's true now.

JCBreckenridge: "Lincoln, in forming an army and invading the Confederacy border committed an act of war."

None of which happened until after the Confederacy started war at Fort Sumter, and formally declared war on May 6, 1861.

204 posted on 07/06/2013 10:11:53 PM PDT by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

Gosh, who knew that the slave power that organized to take over US forts, and fired on Ft Sumter was controlled by the Republicans?

We are so lucky that we have you to tell us these news flashes. (/sarcasm)


205 posted on 07/06/2013 10:13:57 PM PDT by donmeaker (Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

One point is the 1820 issues had been resolved by 1860. They had new issues.

One issue in 1860 was slavery in the territories. The slave power wanted it. The Republicans didn’t. The Republicans were willing to pass legislation and offer amendments to prevent slavery in the territories. The slave power was willing to start a war to assure slavery in the territories.


206 posted on 07/06/2013 10:19:34 PM PDT by donmeaker (Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: BroJoeK

“By your own oft-repeated standard, states are still free to leave the same way they entered meaning with the approval of Congress.”

Half a million American men died proving this is not so.


207 posted on 07/06/2013 10:20:21 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

What is your plan to peel off Austin from Texas? Certainly there is a hotbed of liberals there.


208 posted on 07/06/2013 10:22:44 PM PDT by donmeaker (Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker

Come Monday and find out.


209 posted on 07/06/2013 10:24:02 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker

“willing to start a war”

Then why did they state they simply wanted to leave? They were happy leaving the territories to the North.


210 posted on 07/06/2013 10:25:07 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

Lee personally freed slaves, when forced to do so by his father in law’s will, after going to court in the midst of war several times in an attempt to avoid freeing them.

The girl slaves born after his father in law wrote his will were sold off, as not being under the terms of his father in law’s will. In the midst of the war he paid slave catchers for kidnapped persons who could be represented as slaves, captured by diversion of the pretended confederate cavalry to slave catching from screening duties during his military invasion of PA. Then at Gettysburg he had the cheek to blame his lack of intelligence on the Union forces on others.


211 posted on 07/06/2013 10:29:15 PM PDT by donmeaker (Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker

So he personally freed more slaves than he ever himself owned?

I wonder if Lincoln can say the same.


212 posted on 07/06/2013 10:32:30 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

No, they died preventing the slave power from using an oligarchy to make war against the US.


213 posted on 07/06/2013 10:33:49 PM PDT by donmeaker (Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

Lee didn’t free more slaves than he owned. Rather, he delayed freedom granted by his father in law, to the extent he could. My understanding is that all but 50,000 US slaves were freed by Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation and the hard fighting of the US forces.

Certainly that is far more than were freed by RE Lee.


214 posted on 07/06/2013 10:35:42 PM PDT by donmeaker (Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

The slave power thrived on lies.

Kind of like their defenders today.


215 posted on 07/06/2013 10:36:37 PM PDT by donmeaker (Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker

Like I said. Come Monday and find out. :)


216 posted on 07/06/2013 10:37:29 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker

“Lee didn’t free more slaves than he owned.”

How many slaves did he own? How many did he free? Is the number of slaves that he freed > the number that he owned?

“My understanding”

Did Lincoln free any personally?


217 posted on 07/06/2013 10:39:01 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: RedHeeler

I hesitate to speak for the Divine.

I would suggest that being opposed to Slavery would put one on the side of the Angles, while being a supporter of slavery would put one into the opposition.


218 posted on 07/06/2013 10:39:55 PM PDT by donmeaker (Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

Certainly the EP was his personal policy. Noone else was responsible for it.

That puts about 4 million into Lincoln’s side of the ledger.

Let me know when the Lee family releases his slave ledgers.


219 posted on 07/06/2013 10:42:20 PM PDT by donmeaker (Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

Hmmm. Interesting point. Say, can the southern born Democrat Party, say, they ever freed, any slaves?


220 posted on 07/06/2013 10:42:54 PM PDT by RedHeeler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 461 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson