Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia Builds Missile Defense It Would Deny U.S.
Investor's Business Daily ^ | July 5, 2013 | IBD EDITORIALS

Posted on 07/05/2013 6:32:24 AM PDT by raptor22

Weaponry: As Moscow complains about U.S. missile defense plans in Europe, it is completing an anti-missile radar site in southern Russia to protect its homeland against missile strikes. Our flexibility meets their hypocrisy.

On the heels of a test last month of a missile that U.S. intelligence officials believe violates the 1987 Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces (INF) treaty, Russia is completing a large radar station near Armavir situated near the Black Sea and designed to detect missiles launched from Europe and Iran.

During a flight test of the Yars-M road-mobile missile on June 6, the missile traveled from a launch center at Kapustin Yar and landed at an impact range at Sary-Shagan, about 2,000 kilometers, or 1,242 miles, away. The distance would make the missile an INF-covered weapon.

While President Obama in his Berlin speech committed the U.S. to reducing its nuclear warhead stockpile by one-third, Moscow is clearly committed to modernizing and expanding its strategic nuclear weapons capability, matching it with a missile defense capability as it seeks to limit ours.

The Armavir radar is one of four advanced missile defense radars built by Russia in recent years and being rushed into service by 2020. Each of the radar can track up to 500 objects simultaneously. Two of the stations already are deployed near St. Petersburg and in Siberia in the Irkutsk region.

The fourth radar is located in the Baltic enclave of Kaliningrad. That's where Moscow threatened to deploy advanced Iskander short-range nuclear-capable missiles if the U.S. went forward with Bush administration plans to deploy ground-based interceptors in Poland and missile defense radars in the Czech Republic. All the the radars are protected by highly advanced Russian S-400 air defense and anti-missile interceptors.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.investors.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; Israel; Russia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: defense; ibd; ibddefense; israel; missiledefense; russia; turkey; waronterror
Vlad The Impaler strikes again - "flexibility" means Obama grabbing his ankles
1 posted on 07/05/2013 6:32:24 AM PDT by raptor22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: raptor22
Russia Builds Missile Defense It Would Deny U.S.

I wouldn't be surprised if emperor Barry the TRAITOR supplied the technical details to the russkies as part of his "greater flexibility".

2 posted on 07/05/2013 6:39:53 AM PDT by The Sons of Liberty (Endowed by my Creator with certain unalienable rights!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty

Russians actually had both a technology and deployed functional ABM systems in 1970s, long BEFORE further development and deployment was banned by treaty.


3 posted on 07/05/2013 7:20:54 AM PDT by cunning_fish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: raptor22
What a foolish title. Russia is deploying missle defense on Russian territory, or areas adjacent to Russian territory.

Conversely, the U.S. wants to ring Russia with missles in Eastern Europe; the so called missle defense project. The problem for Russia is that these missles can strike targets deep inside Russia.

Don't drink the colaid.

4 posted on 07/05/2013 7:25:17 AM PDT by OldCorps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum; markomalley; Clairity; Carlucci; grey_whiskers; meyer; WL-law; Para-Ord.45; ...

IBD EDITORIAL PING


5 posted on 07/05/2013 7:31:29 AM PDT by raptor22 (Visit my blog at True Conservatives on Twitter: http://t.co/IKpP3cwq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

I want one for home protection.


6 posted on 07/05/2013 7:47:06 AM PDT by CMB_polarization
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cunning_fish
I am familiar with the system they deployed in the 70s - 64 Galosh launchers surrounding Moscow. This system was designed to use nuke to explode in close proximity to warheads, - effective but with some cost.

Our current system uses a kinetic kill technique where the interceptor actually impacts the incoming warhead. I pray we never have to use it for real.

7 posted on 07/05/2013 12:30:30 PM PDT by The Sons of Liberty (Endowed by my Creator with certain unalienable rights!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

Vlad has a lot of land to defend (12 time zones), Vlad has more Muslim problems than the USA. Vlad anticipates future problems coming from the south, he has the longest border in the world with potential unrest. Vlad is something we don’t have here, A LEADER, and a defender of his country.


8 posted on 07/05/2013 8:28:48 PM PDT by Bringbackthedraft (Remember Ty Woods, Glenn Doherty and Sean Smith? Forgot already?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson