Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sukhoi-30mki
I agree for an American F-16XL, but look at all that's been done with MiG-21s in the refurbish and retrofit markets, as one example.

Somewhere down the road a few years, all those aging F-16s...who knows? I see market potential and that's a sexy upgrade to the standard retrofit package that market will be offering.

Just a day dream. But then, I still live to see the F-23 fully developed and in service. *sigh* What a great F-14 replacement it would make, not to mention revive the "who has the better fighter argument?" between the Navy and AF.

107 posted on 07/04/2013 3:50:23 PM PDT by GBA (Our obamanation: Animal Farm meets 1984 in A Brave New World. Crony capitalism, chaos and control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]


To: GBA

The Mig-21/Mirage-III/F-5 upgrades have been popular for one reason- Cost. Such aircraft are not a threat to their vendors hawking newer platforms. The 21 or Mirage-3 don’t come anywhere close to anything to a Mig-29 or Mirage-2000.

That’s not the same case with a souped up F-16 like the F16U. Barring all aspects stealth, it can match or even better the F-35 in some parameters. Which is precisely the reason why LM happily peddles barebones upgrades like the F-16V variant.


108 posted on 07/04/2013 3:55:56 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson