Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Any Freeper Lawyers?

QUESTION - Will the Defense move to dismiss charges after the Prosecution rests.

It seems Judge would have to dismiss at least the 2nd degree murder charge? Correct

13 posted on 07/02/2013 4:00:15 PM PDT by 11th Commandment (http://www.thirty-thousand.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: 11th Commandment

There is only one charge against Zimmerman: murder in the second degree. There are no lesser charges. If the prosecution has failed to provide sufficient evidence of depraved mind then the judge can issue a directed verdict of acquittal. The prosecution cannot reduce the charge once the trial has begun.


50 posted on 07/02/2013 4:38:07 PM PDT by Procyon (Decentralize, degovernmentalize, deregulate, demonopolize, decredentialize, disentitle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: 11th Commandment
-- Will the Defense move to dismiss charges after the Prosecution rests. --

Yes. Motion for a Judgment of Acquittal. The state has not produced evidence that disproves self defense beyond a reasonable doubt. The self defense theory has not been ruled "impossible" by the state's evidence.

The judge should grant it, but she will deny it. This is an issue for appeal, in the highly unlikely case the jury convicts.

-- It seems Judge would have to dismiss at least the 2nd degree murder charge? --

Dismissal is based on justified use of force. That trumps any underlying charge. If it goes to a jury, the jury will get instructions on murder 2 and manslaughter. The difference is defendant's state of mind. he has to have a depraved mind, indifferent to human life in order to be convicted of murder 2. Negligence is enough to sustain a manslaughter conviction. But, again, self defense trumps, and the reason the case should be dismissed after the state rests is because the state did not disprove self defense.

You do raise a point I hadn't considered, judge thinks there is enough evidence to disprove self defense, but not enough evidence to make murder 2 (no depraved mind, ill will, spite). That combination of finding would result in charging the jury with only an manslaughter charge - or, the judge might read the law as only giving the JURY the option for lesser charges, and the judge does not have the option to allow a lesser included charge. I don't know a case on that point.

55 posted on 07/02/2013 4:41:38 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: 11th Commandment

doubt it. the way this judge is goibg she’ll say it’s up to the jury to look at the case presented and determine if they’ve proven beyond a reasonable doubt.


58 posted on 07/02/2013 4:46:11 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: 11th Commandment
QUESTION - Will the Defense move to dismiss charges after the Prosecution rests.

Don't they always? Even if the Prosecution's case was good?

71 posted on 07/02/2013 5:05:57 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (I am a dissident. Will you join me? My name is John....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: 11th Commandment

The defense would always make the motion, though they may not believe they are going to get it, they would make the motion.

On appeal, one issue may then be that the motion was improperly denied.

There is no way this judge will take the responsibility for dismissing these charges.

I’m assuming she is an elected judge, but even if not, she will not assume a duty that she can avoid.


114 posted on 07/02/2013 8:11:26 PM PDT by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: 11th Commandment
Any Freeper Lawyers?
QUESTION - Will the Defense move to dismiss charges after the Prosecution rests.
It seems Judge would have to dismiss at least the 2nd degree murder charge? Correct


I am not an attorney, but I did stay at a Holiday Inn last night, so with that segue, here's what I think of your question. In the article, it said that he could still be convicted of manslaughter, but the state would actually have to argue for manslaughter in the closing of their case, which would doom their second degree murder case. In other words, the jury can only consider manslaughter, if the prosecution argues that is what he should be convicted of. I don't think, given the barrel that this puts the prosecution over, that the defense would let them off the hook with their unethical over-charging in this case.

As I understand it, as soon as this case is finished, their is a line of attorneys who can't wait to file ethics charges against this prosecutor for withholding exculpatory evidence from the judge who issued the arrest warrant for second degree murder.

It looks like she is going to get "Nifonged" professionally (ethics complaints and disbarment), civilly (if the prosecutor can be shown to have withheld evidence, it is a criminal offense, and she can be sued, personally). Unfortunately, the taxpayers of Florida are also going to be on the hook for a few bucks here too, IMHO.
121 posted on 07/02/2013 9:19:07 PM PDT by krogers58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson