Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/02/2013 3:04:55 PM PDT by Second Amendment First
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
To: Second Amendment First

Further breakdown (or breaking-down, as the case may be) of law and order from the executive... just by fiat, choosing to ignore law. And for all the wrong reasons: To leapfrog the next election.


2 posted on 07/02/2013 3:06:45 PM PDT by C210N (When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

Exactly what I was discussing with a friend of mine.

They are pushing the failure past the election.


4 posted on 07/02/2013 3:07:40 PM PDT by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

Why don’t they just delay it until the second Wednesday of November?


5 posted on 07/02/2013 3:07:46 PM PDT by Michael.SF. (Obama lied, Stevens died, now Obama covers up the lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

After the election.


6 posted on 07/02/2013 3:08:19 PM PDT by Ray76 (Do you reject Obama? And all his works? And all his empty promises?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First
Obama just decides which laws he'll enforce? ...again!
7 posted on 07/02/2013 3:08:26 PM PDT by TexasCajun (Creepy-Ass Cracker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

BLINK - what about individual mandates?


9 posted on 07/02/2013 3:12:02 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Fight the culture of nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

Do they mean until after the 2014 elections, no that cannot be the reason they are doing this. /end sarcasm


11 posted on 07/02/2013 3:18:47 PM PDT by stockpirate (GOP = Good Ol' Progressives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

The two people in America who still think ObamaCare will improve their lives must be furious.


13 posted on 07/02/2013 3:25:51 PM PDT by Bluestocking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

But, but, but, Obamacare is SOOO good for us. It is even going to bring down the DEFICIT!. Why would we want to delay all of this goodness? Oh why oh why?


14 posted on 07/02/2013 3:28:24 PM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

15 posted on 07/02/2013 3:28:59 PM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

It’s so important to cover people that we’ve waited five years to do it. What’s another year to those without healthcare?

It’ll work, trust us.


17 posted on 07/02/2013 3:30:05 PM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

DemocRats are shaking in their boots over the coming implosion of their ‘landmark’ legislation.
They own it, lock, stock and barrel.


18 posted on 07/02/2013 3:30:12 PM PDT by mandaladon (The truth about Benghazi is all I want)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

Until after all elections or until democrats fully take over via their illegal citizens.


21 posted on 07/02/2013 3:36:58 PM PDT by Williams (No Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

I would recommend all Business respect the law as written, and not bet on an 0bama waiver of a penalty.

Remember Gibson Guitar, you will never know if you are on a BOLO list


22 posted on 07/02/2013 3:44:46 PM PDT by Steven Tyler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

Wow. President 0bama signs 0bama into law, then SCOTUS upholds it, then 0bama decides when the law will be enforced. Impeachable offense, AGAIN. This is just as bad as overturning our immigration laws then b!tching and moaning about immigration reform.


23 posted on 07/02/2013 3:45:18 PM PDT by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America (PRISON AT BENGHAZI?????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

President Chickensh!t knows that his “landmark legislation” will crush his party once the LIVs get hammered with it.


25 posted on 07/02/2013 3:48:11 PM PDT by Bryanw92 (Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

Individual mandate NOT delayed...


26 posted on 07/02/2013 3:48:56 PM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

Since Obamacare is now the law of the land, can the Republicans take the administration to court to force Obama to enforce the law he championed? Didn’t he take an oath to uphold the law?


30 posted on 07/02/2013 4:02:26 PM PDT by GreenHornet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

If the law says 2014, obamma cannot change it to a later date! The law is the law. The RATS needs to be held accountable during the 2013 elections. This is just a ploy to help the RATS.


31 posted on 07/02/2013 4:03:33 PM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

I said they should this weeks ago if they want to have a chance in 2014. And if I can figured it out...


33 posted on 07/02/2013 4:05:21 PM PDT by deadrock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson