To: Hoodat
Gettysburg, the battle that many historians cite as a key turning point in the US civil war War of Secession WAR OF NORTHERN AGGRESSION!,
I fixed it for ya again!
10 posted on
07/02/2013 8:22:33 AM PDT by
DCBryan1
(No realli, moose bytes can be quite nasti!!)
To: DCBryan1
Either way, it was anything but a civil war. By definition, the term “civil war” denotes an internal war for control of the government. At no time was the South battling for control of the US government.
11 posted on
07/02/2013 8:27:45 AM PDT by
Hoodat
(BENGHAZI - 4 KILLED, 2 MIA)
To: DCBryan1
Who attacked fort Sumter?
A agree that the south had a right to secede. But you don’t attack a US fort shortly after secession. Cuba was smart enough to not attack Gitmo.
After a few years you could have negotiated a treaty to take back various federal govt properties. The Rebs shot themselves in the foot on that one
15 posted on
07/02/2013 8:35:37 AM PDT by
Vaquero
(Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
To: DCBryan1
it is still a civil war no matter what you call it.
A rose by any other name still has thorns.
50 posted on
07/02/2013 11:21:19 AM PDT by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson