Posted on 07/02/2013 5:16:14 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
It would be a lot easier to treat someone as a mature adult when they write coherent sentences and spell out the word “people”.
I’ll answer that, in a kangeroo court like this.
From DU:
“I think Zimmerrman intentionally injured himself, to make it appear he had been beaten up.”
“I only wish Travon had actually jumped out from the non existent bushes and punched him in the nose until it squished on his face and hit him so hard he fell on his back,, while Zim, screamed like a little girl, as he fell on his back, and while Travon had his phone in his Kung Fu grip and was chatting up his girlfriend, grabbed that sniveling shrinking violet, sobbing and screaming crybaby, brandishing his gun laying on his back, with his head on the sidewalk, screaming save me, aggghhhhhhh, wah, wah, kicking his legs(probably), help me, help me, I’m a scared, little baby, help, help, I’m a sissy, wimpy, scaredy cat, FUCKING NEIGHBORHOOD WATCH CAPTAIN, wah wah, help, help, save me I’m so scared. And our guy Travon, doesn’t miss a beat as he jumps on top of him and pounds Zimmerman’s head ruthlessly into the sidewalk, big blood stains(right?)”
“And Zimmerman just never quit crying and pleading for his life until after he fires the gun.
(He must have been so frightened) The gun fires. The screaming stops. What a little kitten.”
One of those nightly panels is on a show called “HLN After Dark.” Last night they actually put together some kind of jury - I think it was 9 or 10 women and 2 or 3 men. The question that they were asked to answer was “Does Zimmerman’s story make sense?” Referring mostly to all the video and audio evidence presented on Monday. The results were really scary for Zimmerman: 11 votes “No” and 1 vote “Yes.” All the women voted “No.”
This is ABSURD. The state trying to get the officer’s testimony about Z’s credibility negated with the jury... just because he testified positively for Zimmerman.
Most apt comments. It's 1984 in Bizzaro world.
Is this.......”guess who’s coming to dinner” moment?
In other words, in this trial.....everything is skewed and backasswards. But then, that is usually, if not always, the case when or if leftists are pursuing their agenda. The rule of law and logic and justice is out the window.
O’Mara is ticked, or at least his objection to the “non-question statement” seems to say so....
Bernie is losing it —
He is making some points.
Well the liberal world WILL be able to “unhear” it then. They’re very talented in that way...lol.
How pathetically desparate this guy must appear to the jury. Wow. Stunned by what’s happening today.
OMG....the ignorance is blinding!
He’s coming across as downright hostile and angry...tsk tsk. And it’s early yet. Maybe HE hasn’t had his caffeine fix yet either...?
Bernie playing back Z 911 call and having Serino say that Z exhibited hate and spite.
i refise to respond to RC. maybe we all should.
Yep. Bernie is looking bad !
Why?
One of those nightly panels is on a show called “HLN After Dark.” Last night they actually put together some kind of jury - I think it was 9 or 10 women and 2 or 3 men. The question that they were asked to answer was “Does Zimmerman’s story make sense?” Referring mostly to all the video and audio evidence presented on Monday. The results were really scary for Zimmerman: 11 votes “No” and 1 vote “Yes.” All the women voted “No.”
******************************************************************
Were they serving these women RUM?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.