Replies

Don't confuse liberarianism with anarchy. The Libertarian party has systematically mangled and twisted the meaning, and the oxymoron is laughable -- they propose to use government to prevent free people from creating their own local community regulations against that kind of malaise. They want to use the Federal government to enforce anarchy. Do you think that's why Reagan said - and Ansell, he DID say -- that libertarianism was at the heart of conservatism? Do you think Reagan was stupid?

Ansell, for example in the case of Homosexuals; total freedom in the military, gay marriage, adoption, child custody and everything else.

UNDERSTAND the the only political platform that can "support" this must also support harsh government force to punish people who won't enable or allow it in their units, their schools, their churches, their adoption agencies -- Surely, Ansell, you can see that the Tradmark Liberterian platform, corrupted and twisted, is the antithesis of what "libertarian" is. I distinguish between the small l libertaian -- Thomas Sowell, Ansell, you must know him as one of the finest minds in politics -- is a small l libertarian.

Big L Libertarian as a partty is fraudulent, and you need to KNOW that to understand what Palin means when she refers to, and it electrifies MILLIONS, that "libertarian streak" shared by folks who are getting sick of both parties. Ansell!!!!! Don't be a useful tool of the facists who hi-jacked the Trade name "libertarian"!!!!!!@

The libertarian principle burns at the heart of conservative and moral government. The Founders knew it and that's the way they wrote the Constitution without outlawing prostitution, sodomy, gambling, etc. They figured the people of the States would govern themselves. The Founders were libertarian enough in principle to leave those very kinds of things OUT of the Constitution.

What a silly argument, you simply deny what is.

Libertarians are not famous for merely supporting conservatives for their economics, libertarians are a breed apart because they are radical leftists on social issues.

Ignore what they share with conservatives and look at why they are at war against conservatives and why they can’t simply call themselves conservative.

Since today’s topic is homosexuality, tell us where libertarianism is in opposition to this libertarian position.

1.3 Personal Relationships (libertarian)
Sexual orientation, preference, gender, or gender identity should have no impact on the government’s treatment of individuals, such as in current marriage, child custody, adoption, immigration or military service laws. Government does not have the authority to define, license or restrict personal relationships. Consenting adults should be free to choose their own sexual practices and personal relationships.

The Founders knew it and that's the way they wrote the Constitution without outlawing prostitution, sodomy, gambling, etc. They figured the people of the States would govern themselves. The Founders were libertarian enough in principle to leave those very kinds of things OUT of the Constitution.

That is sick, twisted, and perverted, you are claiming that America was founded with an intentional path to gay marriage and homosexuals adopting and serving in the military and all the rest of the leftist satanic agenda listed in post 66.

The people who created America were such right-wing fundamentalist Christians that it never occurred to anyone that your agenda was even humanly possible, much less that it would be discovered in the constitution that they were fighting for and forming this Christian nation upon.