Just more for the Bush Republicans to respond to.
Is the violation of our Constitutional rights what they stand for?????
I can let them call Snowden a traitor and its clear he’s violated laws, but I will not allow them to defend the collection of all this data.
They must oppose it but they steadfastly refuse to do so.
It's certainly not what I stand for.
I can let them call Snowden a traitor and its clear he’s violated laws, but I will not allow them to defend the collection of all this data.
You know, I'm not sure Snowden is a criminal; by bringing the practice into the public (not to mention the scope) he was upholding his oath to protect and defend the Constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic. Moreover, would a contract binding you to some group still be binding if you found out that said group was going to murder someonea nd by the terms of that contract you had to help? If such would not be a legally binding contract, then why would a contract which bound him to violate the Constitution, the supreme law of the land, be valid?
They must oppose it but they steadfastly refuse to do so.
This is the key point; like amnesty they must oppose it... but they don't. This begs the question why?
, and the answers seem to indicate a plan to reduce the average American to a position where he would envy a serf (Fourth-class citizens). The First-class, would of course be the political overlords; the Second-class would be the Burearchy [rule by Bureaucrats], the Third would be our Mexican/Latin-American overlords.