Yes. Absolutely. This interrogation is Feb 29.
Serino was played by some race-hustlers though, at least one in the SPD. Serino fudged a recommendation to charge, based on the fictitious legal principle that "could have stayed in the truck" creates basis for manslaughter. "Could have avoided the incident." The pressure to charge comes from inside and outside the department, and Serino's "quick move" catches Wolfinger's office by surprise.
My apologies, I think I’m more confused now!
Are you saying that this interview we are listening to, is AFTER crump got involved?
And THAT is why Serino is being a pitbull?
Thanks for your help ~