[XenaLee]

You can get almost anyone to say almost anything if you bribe, or in some cases threaten, them enough. Most of the people that have heard about this case (and who hasn’t?) have already made up their minds as to Z’s guilt or innocense. The only question here is, does the person testifying care enough about their career to not risk being caught lying on the stand. In Nakasone’s case, who is going to prove that he lied under oath if he claims that it was definitely not Z crying for help? On the other hand, if Z gets off, Nakasone’s career in his field will take a hit and he’ll be known as the guy who got it wrong (or one of them). JMO

[cuban leaf]

Most of the people that have heard about this case (and who hasn’t?) have already made up their minds as to Z’s guilt or innocense.

---

When I first heard about this case I thought Z was probably guilty. But I was basing that opinion on some very limited information from brief “headline” type stories. When It hit the news the second time I dug into it. It became extremely clear early on that the case against him was not as sound as I had assumed. Within a week of “researching” through media stories, the truth, as usual, percolated to the surface.

I’ve been on his side ever since. And the more I learn, the more I knew I was correct to make that flip.