[cuban leaf]

No matter what is proposed....Jurors make up their own definition of reasonable doubt. The Casey case is a good example.

---

Yes, but they tend to err in the direction of interpretting “beyond a reasonable doubt” to “beyond the shadow of a doubt”.

Gawd I hate conversing in “fuzzy” language. :-(

[BlueDragon]

jumping in here... sidebar about Prosecution resistant to "concrete detail" being spoken of.

I was wondering myself howZ had his head on concrete, and they were tussling on "grass". A pathway or stepping stone/paving stone?

Defense now wandering in "Christian" questions.