Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RummyChick

O’MARA: And by this movement —

SMITH: The hands going up and the leaning over.

O’MARA: OK. So like that?

SMITH: Right. O’MARA: And in just doing that movement, that was enough of a movement where the gun was exposed, correct?

SMITH: Correct.

O’MARA: The jacket didn’t cover the gun by more than a couple, few inches, right?

SMITH: I don’t believe so.

O’MARA: OK. Any movement up of the jacket, even that small movement that he did by leaning over exposed the gun, right?

SMITH: Correct.

O’MARA: Had the jacket been ridden up in any form the gun would have been exposed, right?


So yes, if Zimmerman walked around the complex holding his arms in the air and bending his body, the gun would have been exposed. Lots of CCW holders, like myself, do not walk around with our arms in the air...


1,683 posted on 07/01/2013 10:03:23 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (Liberals are like locusts...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1674 | View Replies ]


To: Mr Rogers

See my 1686. The jacket covers his belt by 6 to 8 inches while at a normal, standing position. His gun would STILL have been covered even if he had been walking around like Frankenstein.

Of course that contradicts dee dee’s testimony that Martin told her about the creepy ass cracker with a gun... Oh wait. I guess Martin somehow forgot to mention that little detail.


1,700 posted on 07/01/2013 10:30:45 PM PDT by 21twelve ("We've got the guns, and we got the numbers" adapted and revised from Jim M.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1683 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson