Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fawn
so you mean a NOT GUILTY verdict?

Yep. Like I expected a GUILTY verdict in the OJ trial.

You’re post is confusing?

This whole trial and the reason it even exists is very confusing. The whole thing seems upside down and backwards. The Prosecution witnesses keep confirming George Zimmerman's REPEATED statements to investigators about exactly what happened.

The Prosecutor keeps trying to IMPEACH his own witnesses. Listening to Rachel testify just about completely scrambled my last brain cells. I'm surprised I can write complete words.

1,388 posted on 07/01/2013 4:12:27 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The monsters are due on Maple Street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1352 | View Replies ]


To: UCANSEE2
If it's any consolation, I knew your original post was sarcasm. To me, it dripped with it. You were mocking a foregone conclusion that was a non sequitur to the facts.

-PJ

1,467 posted on 07/01/2013 5:17:49 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1388 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson