Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BarnacleCenturion

Why wasn’t he being serious? Is he so ignorant?

The Death Eaters’ house philosopher, Peter Singer, has already said there’s nothing wrong with having sex with animals, as long as the animal doesn’t suffer any visible harm.


5 posted on 06/29/2013 4:25:19 AM PDT by Tax-chick (I want shrimp tacos.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tax-chick

Peter Singer, has already said there’s nothing wrong with having sex with animals, as long as the animal doesn’t suffer any visible harm.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
He knows that for a fact as the last time he asked his horse if he minded having sex with him, the horse said “NAY”.
The sheep said “Bah” but since he had his waders, he said ‘Why not’ and went ahead anyway.

Don’t they take the animal’s ‘MENTAL HEALTH’ into consideration?

Sure we have some shrinks out there that will claim the animal suffers trauma the same as a rape victim and should be compensated. Of course, then the owner of the animal would demand compensation, thereby laying MORE money in the hands of the lawyers and shrinks....

Follow the bouncing ball.


6 posted on 06/29/2013 4:33:24 AM PDT by xrmusn (6/98 --Inside every 'older' man there is a 'younger' man wondering "WTF happened")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson