Will they be influenced by the admitted fact that she lied multiple times, including under oath, and then make the, ahem, RATIONAL CONCLUSION that she is not to be trusted and believed?
Will they see Martin as an unsavory and less sympathetic character because he referred to Zimmerman as a “creepy-ass cracker,” according to Jeantel’s testimony, and also a “nigga?”
My, my. The deep mysteries of the universe.
One wonders how they would see Zimmerman if someone produced evidence he called Trayvon Martin a racial slur?
Will they understand that the word “cracker” that Jeantel attributed to Martin is less a malicious slur draped in his ill will toward Zimmerman than a toothless slang word black teens use to describe white people — just as they use the word “nigga” to describe everybody, including each other?
Oh. Well, then. Maybe "n*****" isn't really a malicious slur, either. Maybe it's just a toothless slang word that some white folks use to describe black people.
The stupid is strong with this one.
Great counter point!