Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Flood evacuees furious as RCMP enter locked homes to confiscate firearms.
Radio Canada International ^ | Friday 28 June, 2013 | Marc Montgomery

Posted on 06/28/2013 7:01:25 PM PDT by Candor7

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: FreedomPoster
Everyone needs something like this when bugging out.


21 posted on 06/28/2013 7:52:26 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

Always leave a box of donuts on the counter when abandoning your house.


22 posted on 06/28/2013 7:52:50 PM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ace's Dad

More like enforcing Fascism.


23 posted on 06/28/2013 7:53:15 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

The RMCP would be digging 4shot out of their Backside!


24 posted on 06/28/2013 8:04:43 PM PDT by EnglishOnly (Fight all out to win OR get out now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: American in Israel

I saw the article in the Calgary newspaper online.

The Mounties claim they only took the firearms that were in plain sight.

Yeah, sure. Uh-huh.


25 posted on 06/28/2013 8:07:35 PM PDT by july4thfreedomfoundation (Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be a chain of convenience stores.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

It’s the 90% of cops that are thugs that make the others look bad. Of course, their covering for the thugs doesn’t help.


26 posted on 06/28/2013 8:11:53 PM PDT by freedomfiter2 (Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: expat1000
I'm going this way:

"Harry Randall Truman (October 30, 1896 – May 18, 1980) was a resident of the U.S. state of Washington who lived on Mount St. Helens and came to brief fame in the months preceding the 1980 eruption after stubbornly refusing to leave his home. "

27 posted on 06/28/2013 8:19:30 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Para-Ord.45
Last time I checked if you were a firearms owner in Canada they do not require a warrant to search your premises . Sections 102-105 of the Firearms Act

So I guess this Lawyer & firearms specialist doesn't know the law?

“This is without precedent, this is unreasonable search and seizure,” said Ed Burlew, lawyer and firearms specialist in Ontario. “The entry was illegal, it’s against the charter, it was unreasonable search and seizure. There’s no judge that would uphold the evidence obtained through an illegal entry into a person’s home.”

28 posted on 06/28/2013 8:35:03 PM PDT by ASouthernGrl (BHO sucks - literally or metaphorically, you decide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Candor7
He said the guns will be returned to owners after residents are allowed back in town and they provide proof of ownership,

In other words, never.

29 posted on 06/28/2013 8:37:33 PM PDT by piytar (The predator-class is furious that their prey are shooting back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: max americana

One difference: try this in Texas, and there WILL be violence. OK, one other difference: the local PDs would side with the citizens even though certain police chiefs (I’m thinking Plano, TX) might try to order otherwise.


30 posted on 06/28/2013 8:40:21 PM PDT by piytar (The predator-class is furious that their prey are shooting back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DakotaGator

I hope they didn’t ride their horses through the residents’ living rooms! /s;)


31 posted on 06/28/2013 8:49:36 PM PDT by Frank_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Candor7; Clive; exg; Alberta's Child; albertabound; AntiKev; backhoe; Byron_the_Aussie; ...
Thanks Candor7.

To all- please ping me to Canadian topics.

Canada Ping!

32 posted on 06/28/2013 9:05:58 PM PDT by Squawk 8888 (I'd give up chocolate but I'm no quitter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7
New Orleans cops did the same after Hurricane Katrina.

The cops will never do it again. It's against state law now.

33 posted on 06/28/2013 9:28:25 PM PDT by BBell (And Now for Something Completely Different)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Did you mean you are in Alberta now?


34 posted on 06/28/2013 9:31:53 PM PDT by expat1000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

President You Didn’t Build That asks one of his top assistants to have someone take notes.


35 posted on 06/28/2013 9:31:53 PM PDT by Standing Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: davetex

That’s Premier Allison Redford of the “Progressive Conservative Party” no kidding.....


36 posted on 06/28/2013 9:37:54 PM PDT by Nextrush (A BALANCED BUDGET NOW AND PRESIDENT SARAH PALIN ARE AT THE TOP OF MY LIST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ASouthernGrl; Para-Ord.45

The first sections (102-3) refer to gun dealers.

Then 104 says:
104. (1) An inspector may not enter a dwelling-house under section 102 except
(a) on reasonable notice to the owner or occupant, except where a business is being carried on in the dwelling-house; and
(b) with the consent of the occupant or under a warrant.

It goes on to specify exactly where an inspection may be made - what rooms and such.

105 is to do with *inspecting* a firearm to check serial numbers, whether it is a “restricted weapon” (not only handguns but certain long guns like my old M14 which I had to leave behind years ago. {sigh})

NOTE: the entire section is to do with inspection - nothing at all about seizure or confiscation.

NOTE ALSO: (3) In carrying out an inspection of a place under subsection (1), an inspector may not use force.


37 posted on 06/28/2013 9:42:45 PM PDT by expat1000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: BBell

You forgot the sarcasm tag. They ignored a sworn oath to the US Constitution before. They will ignore the state constitution in the future, if it suits them.


38 posted on 06/28/2013 9:46:41 PM PDT by Kirkwood (Zombie Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

Never let a crisis go to waste, thier testing


39 posted on 06/29/2013 2:45:19 AM PDT by ronnie raygun (Yesterdays conspiracies are todays truths)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

“Prime Minister Stephen Harper is furious at the actions of the RCMP”, let’s see what this pol does not what he says. I hope he is not just another fraud. Actually I think he is all talk!


40 posted on 06/29/2013 4:07:27 AM PDT by iopscusa (El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson