Why do you think its a good thing that people not have the ability to read our nations founding documents in their original form?
Do you really want academics to be the only ones who can read and interpret those documents for following generations? That’s exactly what people like William Ayers have been working toward for the last 40 years.
Why do you claim my position is something other than I have posted?
Are you really Mike Nifong?
I posted that cursive belongs in the history curriculum.
I still maintain that position.
It does not need to consume hours and hours every week of a students first several years learning to draw precisely replicated loops and curves.
Instead, lets get into things like boolean logic early.
It is fairly ironic that you would try to reword my position into being opposed to the teaching of cursive at all rather than advocating teaching it later and in conjunction with history.