Here are some things that need explanation:
1. If Tray made it to the backyard of his dad’s girlfriend’s house while talking to W8, why didn’t he just go inside?
2. If Tray was “scared”, why did he call W8 and not 911?
3. Why doesn’t Tray’s body have any bruises, marks, etc. if George was the aggressor?
4. Attorney on TV last night said that Tray’s pants had grass stains on the knees, indicating he was kneeling.
5. George wore a red rain coat and it was soaked on the back, indicating he was lying on his back.
6. Other witness said the person on top (during scuffle) was wearing dark clothing.
7. I understand Tray’s phone was in his pocket. Did he put it there in anticipation of attacking George from behind?
Inquiring minds want to know....
The first two questions are answerable with “He’s a tough guy” and “F*** the po-leese.” The rest of it is very interesting information that surely would’ve closed the investigation as justifiable homicide if not for enormous political pressure from the POTUS on down.
[[1. If Tray made it to the backyard of his dad’s girlfriend’s house while talking to W8, why didn’t he just go inside?]]
MOST LIKELY (opinion) because he was a thug who wanted street cred by murderign what he htought was a ‘white cracka’- but htis is goign to be hard to prove motive- however there are the phone calls, but no actual records of what martin said- just hte frst hand recountign of htem by an unreliable witness
[[2. If Tray was “scared”, why did he call W8 and not 911?]]
prosecution can claim ‘there wasn’t time to when the ‘poor kid’ realized he needed to defend himself- of course htis is a crock of crap- but they will likely present a similiar case
[[3. Why doesn’t Tray’s body have any bruises, marks, etc. if George was the aggressor?]]
Prosecution will likely state ‘because george only needed one act- to shoot an unarmed kid’ to subdue him (howeverm then we have eyewitness acoounts of two peopel struggling- but hten the prosecution can claim the kid was just ‘luckier’ than george and got soem licks while george perhaps missed all his punches-)
[[4. Attorney on TV last night said that Tray’s pants had grass stains on the knees, indicating he was kneeling.]]
Prosecution can simpyl state that there is no way to tell exactly where thsoe stains happened or when- not sure id defence can call an expert to determien such a thing either-
[[5. George wore a red rain coat and it was soaked on the back, indicating he was lying on his back.]]
Which isn’t unusual when rollign aroudn in a fight- but htis doesn’t do much to estalish who might have started the fight
[[6. Other witness said the person on top (during scuffle) was wearing dark clothing.]]
Unfortunately this doesn’t do much to establish who started the fight either- witness coudl have coem uin after the fight was goign on for awhile and not be able to know who started the gfight
[[7. I understand Tray’s phone was in his pocket. Did he put it there in anticipation of attacking George from behind?]]
IF so, then the hostile girl witness yeasterday lied abotu hearing the phone drop to the ‘wet grass’
Not tryign to defend trayvon here- just pointing out some issues witrh hte questions you raised that can be explained away by prosecution