Replies

Of course the founding documents said nothing about marriage. People then were educated and valued moral standards; they had ot reason to make a statement that marriage does not mean two sodomites sodomizing each other! Such a wild thought would never have entered their heads - that society would degrade so much, and the government become so tyrannical, that a tiny percentage of mentally ill sex perverts would use government to force everyone to bow to sodomy in the form of destroying the meaning of marriage.

They also do not define “natural born citizen” because everyone knew what that meant, too.

The ONLY reason DOMA was passed in the first place was as a DEFENSE against sex perverts from doing exactly what they have done - that is, get the government (of all levels) in volved in CHANGING the definiton of marriage. It is the sodomy pushers who are using Huge Nanny State Government to force the perversion of marriage on everyone. THe fact that people like rabid dog and other liberaltarians are slamming people who share my POV and not slamming the mentally ill sex perverts and their supporters who have used Huge Nanny State Government to push their sick and destructive agenda is very revealing.

The homosexual agenda pushers will never, ever stop in their mad march to societal revolution and destruction. Already today are headlines that churches will lose tax exempt status if they don’t marry two same sex perverts in church, and the military will now give benefits to pairs of sodomy practitioners.

I guess this is fine and dandy with people like you.

Enjoy the ride, it’s going to get a lot rougher.

I see your concerns, maybe there were times things have gotten out of hand on the side of the homosexual lobby, heck, you have hotheads on both sides. My take is that if I was on the Scotus, I'd ask, "OK, what does the Federal Constitution say on this matter?" That is the only important question. My take is that the Constitution is silent on the Federal level, thus kicking it back to the States, that's how I write my opinion. I remember Red Skelton did a presentation on how the system works where you have 48 individual States (well in his day, 50 States now or if you are Obongo, 57 States B-P) getting together to unite as one, yet each are individual. On this matter, it means some States will allow same sex marriage, others oppose it, others may not even care. Let the people of each State decide through their representatives. Sure I have a personal take on it but we need to remember, "What would the Constitution say?" Again the ruling on Prop 8 destroys that.

I guess if there are people that want the Feds involved in defining marriage, which I don't suggest, but the legal way to do it is to amend he Constitution itself much like Serbia and Russia did.