Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rollo tomasi
Do you have the audacity to suggest that those who wrote the Constitution had homosexual marriage on their minds?

No, I have the audacity to suggest that they had the audacity to leave things out of the control of the government and in the control of the States, or the people.

Look what the Feds did to bigamy in the 19th century, lol. You do support this homosexual expansion (hence your "society cop-out), you are just too scared to admit that on this forum.

No, I just severely distrust the FedGov and think ceding any more authority to it is stupid. The 4th is explicit, as is the 6th, yet the NSA abused it's ability and power legally, though not lawfully, justified by the FISA-court.

If then our highest law is discarded and other twisted legalisms (based on Federal law, regulation, and/or *spit* precedence) are held higher than that then what will come of defining marriage in the federal level?
Seriously, you're begging for more tyranny.

260 posted on 06/26/2013 5:04:28 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies ]


To: OneWingedShark
Founders never envisioned a sexual revolution and break down to the extent of redefining marriage. Also the monster Entitlements yet that still happened as well as the 16th along with the Social Security Act where the feds explicitly defined marriage. Make that stuff unconstitutional (16th requires another Amendment) then originality will start to be restored. Today, the feds expanded marriage, not draw the definition back.

Horrible situation all around unless you favor homosexual institutional "rights".
262 posted on 06/26/2013 5:12:19 PM PDT by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies ]

To: OneWingedShark
Why were pensions granted to widows? The Feds fully understood marriage, the institutions responsibility and importance. Also, the people spoke to the Feds and the Fed politicians aligned with the people. How do you explain that? Where was your firewall that prevented expansion? In the Supreme Court, lol. Originality/Constitution is long gone, the feds are just functioning based on biases and disingenuous arguments.

Hell, you are supporting Ginsburg, Kennedy (Libertarian fluky), the two lesbos, and Breyer. Pretty glorious company you have there.
267 posted on 06/26/2013 5:20:34 PM PDT by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson