To: rollo tomasi
Oh, I see...you just want uncle fedgov to keep handing you all those benefits at my expense and you’re just mad that the homosexuals are in on your gravy train now.
189 posted on
06/26/2013 10:06:26 AM PDT by
Orangedog
(An optimist is someone who tells you to 'cheer up' when things are going his way)
To: Orangedog
No, I want SS gone, Medicare/Medicaid gone, the 16th Amend gone, Welfare gone, targeted tax cuts gone, and any other Federal Entitlement gone. If that stuff is staying (Which reality dictates those programs/laws are, witness the electorate LOL), I want the feds to at least maintain a logical awareness in the face of a perverted generation saying marriage is not the natural definition when those other laws were established.
What you call for is that perverted expansion by default yet you deny that for some reason.
Reality is being debated here, not some Constitutional fantasy where originality is long passed dead.
Give me some assurances that all Federal goodies are gone before you spout on with a useless thesis on why the feds should not be in the marriage business. That is not reality, reality is that you are favoring marriage expansion by the Feds (Exact opposite of what you call for). Where was the drawback of the feds recognition of marriage in today's ruling?
193 posted on
06/26/2013 10:19:18 AM PDT by
rollo tomasi
(Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson