[Orangedog]

I’m not cherry picking. I’ve been pretty consistent in my position. Instead of fighting to get the feds out of something they have no business in, you would rather just have the rules changed again so you can exclude the homosexuals from fedgovs unconstitutional favors you get at the expense of single people.

[rollo tomasi]

"Instead of fighting to get the feds out of something they have no business in."

How do you fight the 16th Amendment and the Social Security act? By voting for Libertarians? Yeah, that is a real effective tactic.

Tell me, how can one Court allow one particular definition of marriage (Read the Social Security Act please), then redefine that definition 70+ years later?