Fact of the matter is, though, the states do have some degree of differing laws as to the requirements to get a state issued marriage license.
And WTF do you get off telling me I don't care of tradition and that I "care alot about sex." What kind of twisted jerk are you? There is zero, nada, zilch, nothing in anything I posted here on this thread (or in my entirety of being here on FR) that would back up any of the frivolous allegations you laid at my feet.
My first interaction with you was in regards to your post to another Freeper: "What’s your brilliant plan with spousal visas?'
To which I simply replied:
"I would assume, that the feds would handle a spousal visa the same way they currently handle a spousal visa.
If a state say's someone is married, then the feds go with that."
Shame on you for twisting what I said into some kind of degenerate filth.
Indeed they do have ‘some degree’, but they do not have the authority to change the definition of marriage.
This is not a states right issue - the federal government does have the authority to regulate the definition of marriage.
The reason why visas are important is because they help to demonstrate why state definition of marriage is inadequate. It’s a loophole that Obama is going to exploit through abuse of the immigration system.
I apologize for going off on you. I’m just annoyed and aggravated to find myself arguing with the liberaltarians here cheering on this horrific decision.
You did not deserve to be treated that way.