[PapaNew]

You misunderstand me. I believe freedom means that on a local level, I may not always get what I want if enough people on a local level vote otherwise. I personally am against sodomy. But I am also against government interfering with people's private lives when they are not interfering with another's freedom. Otherwise, today government interferes with those we don't agree with and tomorrow, it will interfere with the rest of what we thought we were free to do.

Peoples personal choices (that do not interfere others personal choices) are personal and spiritual issues and are solved at that level. They are not political or judicial issues, IMO.

[AppyPappy]

Does that freedom include the freedom to choose polygamy?

[caww]

<....”I am also against government interfering with people’s private lives when they are not interfering with another’s freedom”.....>

Then they need to keep it private....

the homosexual agenda is NOT to keep it private...but to force recognition of their sexual preferences on society...in our schools, churches and homes.

This has never been a private matter for them...it’s a push straight from the pits of hell!