To: BuckeyeTexan
All I will say is that if I were a polygamist or a zoophile, I would have an airtight case for recognition, that is if our court rules homosexual ‘marriage’ a right. There is no justification not to expand it further. Kennedy is with the rats this time, and Roberts may jump.
To: Viennacon
That's pretty much what Scalia said in his dissent in Lawrence v. Texas - that if the Court refused to uphold state laws based on morality that laws against incest, bestiality, adultery, pornography, etc. would crumble.
22 posted on
06/25/2013 10:35:12 PM PDT by
BuckeyeTexan
(There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson