Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama to State: Don’t approve Keystone if it adds greenhouse gas emissions
Hot Air ^ | 4:41 pm on June 25, 2013 | by Mary Katharine Ham

Posted on 06/25/2013 2:54:48 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 06/25/2013 2:54:48 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks; SunkenCiv; Marine_Uncle; NormsRevenge; SierraWasp; Grampa Dave; onyx; ...

fyi


2 posted on 06/25/2013 2:56:38 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Never mind the thousands of jobs that this pipeline would create.


3 posted on 06/25/2013 2:57:53 PM PDT by Coldwater Creek (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

His Saudi masters don’t like the American competition!


4 posted on 06/25/2013 3:03:48 PM PDT by rawcatslyentist (Jeremiah 50:32 "The arrogant one will stumble and fall With no one to raise him up; And I will set)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Don't buy General Motors either, right?

Same logic!

5 posted on 06/25/2013 3:06:16 PM PDT by blackdog (There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

How does the pollution from a pipeline compare to the pollution from an endless string of ocean-going tankers?

That seems like a relatively easy calculation.


6 posted on 06/25/2013 3:11:25 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

It’s OK Bam, we’re going to refine this oil into gasoline and put it in our cars, but only the aroma of fresh Skittles will come out the back end. Now sign it and go play golf or something.


7 posted on 06/25/2013 3:14:44 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marron
How does the pollution from a pipeline compare to the pollution from an endless string of ocean-going tankers?

Or Warren Buffet's trains.

8 posted on 06/25/2013 3:16:31 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (This message has been recorded but not approved by Obama's StasiNet. Read it at your peril.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

EVER WONDER WHAT A POS LOOKS LIKE......NOW YOU KNOW


9 posted on 06/25/2013 3:18:59 PM PDT by The Wizard (Madam President is my President now and in the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

What “greenhouse gas” would that be? Water vapor? Oxygen?

Both are in VASTLY greater proportions in the earth’s atmosphere than carbon dioxide. It has NOT been shown that carbon dioxide has any effect that even remotely approaches that of water vapor when it comes to affecting the climate. At any given time, there is from 20 times to over 100 times the amount of water vapor carried in the earth’s atmosphere than there is of carbon dioxide, and water vapor has a few unique characteristics that are way beyond anything that carbon dioxide is capable of.

For one thing, it is much lighter, and rises far higher in the atmosphere, forming clouds at the surface of the earth up to 40,000 feet or more, and water vapor has a “triple point” that carbon dioxide cannot achieve at normal atmospheric pressure or at ambient temperatures as exist on the earth’s surface. The water molecule can exist as a solid (ice), liquid (come on, don’t tell me you don’t know what WATER is), and as a vapor, colorless and to our senses, tasteless and odorless. Carbon dioxide is all these things as water vapor as a gas, but it may only become a solid at extreme low temperatures, far too cold for life to sustain, and it sublimates directly to a gas under normal atmospheric conditions. Only under several atmospheres of pressure does it ever go into the liquid state.

It is this capacity for water vapor to change its state of existence readily that controls the warming and/or cooling of the earth, not carbon dioxide, which cannot move through these states of matter under surface terrestrial conditions. Anyone who tries to assert differently is either a charlatan or is hopelessly ignorant.

And the same goes for the horse you rode into town, Al Gore.


10 posted on 06/25/2013 3:21:07 PM PDT by alloysteel (Unattended children will be given a Red Bull and a free Kazoo. Reminds me of Congress...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Clear and present danger, year five...


11 posted on 06/25/2013 3:21:33 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Obama: Clear and present danger year five...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

The enemy is within. :(


12 posted on 06/25/2013 3:42:07 PM PDT by Marine_Uncle (Galt level is not far away......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Executive Director Becky Bond said that her group will continue to pressure Obama on Keystone through public action, but suggested that the bulk of the work was now done thanks to protesters like hers.

In a just world, protestors like Becky would have pay for my gasoline every time I had to fuel up.

13 posted on 06/25/2013 3:49:31 PM PDT by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marron

How does the pollution from a pipeline compare to the pollution from an endless string of ocean-going tankers

Yea, especcially as they burn bunker oil that have to be heated to above 60c before it will ignite, must add to the carbondioxide quite a bit andthe keystone pipelineads O in tansportition, and as the carbon contentis ilar to heavy crude from the ME and less than crude oil from Venezuela
you’d think this was poitical or sumting,go figure


14 posted on 06/25/2013 3:52:36 PM PDT by munin (MSNBC?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: marron
You realize that politicians use different logic than us ordinary folks.

We don't worry about votes or campaign money.

15 posted on 06/25/2013 3:57:23 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Coldwater Creek

That oil is moving one way or another. It can either go by pipeline or diesel train.


16 posted on 06/25/2013 4:05:17 PM PDT by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
You realize that politicians use different logic than us ordinary folks.

I realize we don't have the same sub rosa retirement portfolios that they have.

17 posted on 06/25/2013 4:09:04 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit

Bingo - I’ve got a relative in the industry - if the oil doesn’t go by pipeline, it goes by rail (numerous refineries are already gearing up for that expedient).

And it doesn’t take an Einstein to figure out which transport mode generates more CO2 (if one actually gives a rip about that canard). But don’t tell the donkeys - it’s the conservatives who are supposed to be anti-science, so the press allows the ‘rats to ignore even the most fundamental science whenever it suits their wishes.


18 posted on 06/25/2013 5:29:21 PM PDT by Stosh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I thought that Keystone would be likely to decrease greenhouse gas emissions. Look at all the trucks and trains taken out of service when that oil starts going through the pipeline.


19 posted on 06/25/2013 8:25:56 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Drag Me From Hell!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; 11B40; A Balrog of Morgoth; A message; ACelt; Aeronaut; AFPhys; AlexW; ...
DOOMAGE!

Global Warming PING!

You have been pinged because of your interest in environmentalism, alarmist wackos, mainstream media doomsday hype, and other issues pertaining to global warming.

Freep-mail me to get on or off: Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to all note-worthy threads on global warming.

What’s Really Behind Obama’s New Climate Plan?

Global Warming Propaganda’s Last-Ditch Effort Week

Obama To Strap US With More Costs To Fund His New Climate Change Vision

Obama’s Climate Change Policy Is Aimed At Destroying Middle Class

Global Warming on Free Republic

Latest from Global Warming News

Latest from Real Climate

Latest from Climate Depot

Latest from Greenie Watch

Latest from Junk Science

Latest from Terra Daily

20 posted on 06/25/2013 9:09:46 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Drag Me From Hell!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson