[ConservativeInPA]

That is fair to me as well. The media battle has begun. I'm watching Cam Edwards on NRANews on the Sportsmen's Channel and Cam brought up the story.

If you haven't been following the story, the kid refused to remove his NRA t-shirt at school. The school policy has nothing that can be construed to make the NRA t-shirt against school policy. The kid stuck to his guns, so to speak. Then the police were called. He was just a scared kid declaring his innocence to the police and they charge him with obstructing a police officer because he wouldn't shut up.

This is a case of low intelligent liberal educators forcing their personal will on a 14 year old kid, and when the kid shows some backbone the police get called. The cops should have been pissed at the school and supported the kid, but they didn't.

[blackdog]

BTW, when I wore a t-shirt back in the 70's which my teacher found problematic, we were both intelligent and civil enough to allow me to turn it inside out in her classroom. It was her classroom. It was my respect for her opinion. It was her respect for my opinion as long as it was reversed while she had to teach the class.

Are we now that effin stupid that two parties who disagree need cops to strike a reasonable conclusion?

[Bob]

If you haven't been following the story, the kid refused to remove his NRA t-shirt at school. The school policy has nothing that can be construed to make the NRA t-shirt against school policy. The kid stuck to his guns, so to speak. Then the police were called.

Even if he had violated the dress code, which he apparently hadn't, how does his refusal to remove his shirt become a matter for the police? Are violations of a school's dress code now part of criminal law? If so, what specific statute?