Skip to comments.
Supreme Court rule for Florida property owner in land use case
Reuters ^
| Jonathan Stempel and Lawrence Hurley
Posted on 06/25/2013 10:39:18 AM PDT by fifedom
the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday said a Florida property owner may be owed compensation from a government agency that declined to award him a development permit for his land.
(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...
TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: extortion; fees; teaparty; zoning
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
To: LibertarianLiz
Considering the ongoing attack on property rights by the EPA; Yes!, this is news.The EPA is nothing but a front for the UN Agenda 21.
21
posted on
06/25/2013 12:16:42 PM PDT
by
SilverMine
(ever member of congress should be horse whipped)
To: bamahead
22
posted on
06/25/2013 12:42:18 PM PDT
by
Still Thinking
(Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
To: 1rudeboy
We don’t need no steenken heightened Constitutional scrutiny!
23
posted on
06/25/2013 1:09:10 PM PDT
by
1010RD
(First, Do No Harm)
To: Ray76
The Senate Republicans, a/k/a the saviors of the Nation, disagree with your opinion. I happen to agree with you, but that is just me.
24
posted on
06/25/2013 1:13:32 PM PDT
by
sport
To: fifedom
“Pray every night for the health of Justices Thomas, Alito, Scalia, Roberts, and Kennedy”
and YTF should Roberts be included?? That POS is the reason why we now have Odumbocare.
25
posted on
06/25/2013 1:40:20 PM PDT
by
max americana
(fired liberals in our company after the election, & laughed while they cried (true story))
To: 1rudeboy
threatens to subject a vast array of land-use regulations, applied daily in states and localities throughout the country, to heightened constitutional scrutiny.Oh no, those poor regs are being abused! Mass protests are being organized by PETARD (People for the Ethical Treatment of Aggressive Regulatory Documents).
26
posted on
06/25/2013 1:46:41 PM PDT
by
rfp1234
(Arguing with a marxist is like playing Chess with a Pigeon.)
To: rfp1234
27
posted on
06/25/2013 3:22:38 PM PDT
by
Still Thinking
(Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
To: max americana
and YTF should Roberts be included
Because that would mean "Chief Justice Ginsburg" and "Associate Justice Cass Sunstein".
28
posted on
06/25/2013 3:25:29 PM PDT
by
rfp1234
(Arguing with a marxist is like playing Chess with a Pigeon.)
To: max americana
"and YTF should Roberts be included?? That POS is the reason why we now have Odumbocare."
Because we need him on cases like this. Someone who is on my side a majority of the time is my friend.
If Roberts resigns from the court he will be replaced by someone like Kagan and Sotomayor. Would you rather have them?
29
posted on
06/25/2013 4:31:33 PM PDT
by
fifedom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson