Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: green iguana

So what specifically in Section 4 is found to be unconstitutional? What’s in Section 4?


9 posted on 06/25/2013 7:20:25 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Vigilanteman

I’m going to wait half a day for people smarter than me to analyze all the meanings and outworkings of this decision. The case isn’t going anywhere.


15 posted on 06/25/2013 7:24:34 AM PDT by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Vigilanteman
Section 4 is the preclearence section. It says that certain southern states must get any voting changes at all pre-cleared by the Justice Dept before the changes can be enacted. These changes can be as small as changing the boundaries of a water district, or requiring ID to vote.

Texas currently has a voter ID law that is similar to others the Supreme Court has found okay that cannot be implemented because it's being held up by Justice in pre-clearence. This decision means Texas can go ahead and enact the law.

16 posted on 06/25/2013 7:24:47 AM PDT by green iguana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson