Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Perdogg
If I understand correctly, Section 5 (not "4") was not struck down. Only the ancient list of proscribed counties, all the counties in some States, requiring federal pre-clearance before any changes are made in election law.

For example, in N.C. 40 of 100 counties are, or were, "covered" under Sec. 5:

Congress, who placed these counties on this list in 1965, can draw up a new list (or make federal pre-clearance universal).

Preclearance comes either from a Three-Judge federal panel or from the DOJ Civil Rights Division (or both, in some cases.)

There are some redistricting plans presently in litigation, and how they are or are not affected I don't yet know.

39 posted on 06/25/2013 7:32:51 AM PDT by Prospero (Si Deus trucido mihi, ego etiam fides Deus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Prospero

Without Section 4, Section 5 is almost meaningless if I understand it completely.


43 posted on 06/25/2013 7:36:17 AM PDT by Perdogg (Sen Ted Cruz, Sen Mike Lee, and Sen Rand Paul are my adoptive Senators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: Prospero

Where can one find the “preclearance-affected” counties map for other states, such as Texas?


51 posted on 06/25/2013 7:42:52 AM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson