[PapaNew]

Not sure what he means by "not qualified" but SCOTUS is certainly not constitutionally qualified to be ruling on these state-specific matters that are outside the legitimate constitutional scope of the federal government's limited powers.

Truth and right will prevail sooner or later. Sometimes when evil becomes more assertive, it may be a sign of the soon coming end to its prevalence.

[OneWingedShark]

Not sure what he means by "not qualified" but SCOTUS is certainly not constitutionally qualified to be ruling on these state-specific matters that are outside the legitimate constitutional scope of the federal government's limited powers.

And therein lies the problem: the USSC views everything as their constitutional scope. That's one reason why Roe v. Wade is damaging; it's one reason why the Commerce Clause has been stretched and twisted so: to put issues that are not legitimately theirs into their purview.