Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/23/2013 9:35:33 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Lurking Libertarian; JDW11235; Clairity; TheOldLady; Spacetrucker; Art in Idaho; GregNH; ...

FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.

2 posted on 06/23/2013 9:38:13 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Thank You. This is going to be an interesting week. I cannot find another word besides interesting to remain on the forum.


3 posted on 06/23/2013 9:39:06 PM PDT by no-to-illegals (Scrutinize our government and Secure the Blessing of Freedom and Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

And in every case they will come down on the side of the left. The fix is in, folks. It’s a kangaroo court.


4 posted on 06/23/2013 9:40:28 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

After last years ruling on Obamacare, I no longer have any hope that SCOTUS will do the right thing. On any ruling....


5 posted on 06/23/2013 9:41:49 PM PDT by Mom MD (A million people attended Obamas inauguration. 14 of them actually missed work)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

Ping


9 posted on 06/23/2013 9:46:40 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

I’m not making any bets, since I no longer trust our courts.


12 posted on 06/23/2013 9:53:35 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

I can’t believe we’re still fighting reverse discrimination. That’s the only one I feel they may decide correctly on, “feel” being the operative word, as I have no well-informed analysis to back up my hunch. I just think diversity is overworked these days and is not a strong enough interest to outweigh fairness to the individual.


19 posted on 06/24/2013 1:03:21 AM PDT by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan
The constitutional presumption is God-given rights to individuals of life, liberty, and pursuits of happiness. The people and states via the CONSTITUTION created a central (federal) government as a necessary evil and DELEGATED CERTAIN, LIMITED, ENUMERATED powers to that government. As confirmed in the 10th amendment, any powers not delegated to the federal government by the Constitution are preserved to the states and the people.

These are battles for things rightly belonging to the states and individuals not the federal government. The only involvement SCOTUS should have is to declare these a states' issue and remand back to the states accordingly.

As was once penned by Lincoln in the Gettysburg address, "Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure." The difference in this war is the right is FOR states' rights and individual freedom AGAINST the coercion and tyranny of a rogue federal government with ever increasing unconstitutional powers.

May God by his mercy and grace grant that "this nation, under God have a new birth of freedom", not just politically, in right decisions here by decentralizing federal government power, but more importantly, spiritually among the American people. May God once again save and bless America.

Thanks BuckeyeTexan - keep us posted.

20 posted on 06/24/2013 3:15:05 AM PDT by PapaNew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

We all have watched SCOTUS work hard
to estroy America by ignoring
that to which they swore Allegience.


22 posted on 06/24/2013 3:39:30 AM PDT by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

With a rogue Chief Justice, God help us all.


24 posted on 06/24/2013 5:03:27 AM PDT by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

I’m sure Roberts will let us down again.


25 posted on 06/24/2013 5:11:17 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan
i'll be praying.
26 posted on 06/24/2013 5:44:07 AM PDT by Drawn7979
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lurking Libertarian; JDW11235; Clairity; TheOldLady; Spacetrucker; Art in Idaho; GregNH; ...
Supreme Court to Consider Obama Recess Appointments

The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to decide the scope of a president's constitutional authority to make recess appointments, a power that Democratic and Republican administrations have used for decades to install nominees without Senate confirmation.

The justices agreed to consider an appeal by the Obama administration, which is seeking to overturn a lower-court ruling that invalidated President Barack Obama's use of recess appointments to fill vacancies at the National Labor Relations Board. That ruling threatened the legitimacy of hundreds of actions the labor board has taken since the president used the recess power to install three new board members on Jan. 4, 2012.

29 posted on 06/24/2013 6:45:56 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

We’re going to find a whole bunch of brand new socons around these parts after this week.


37 posted on 06/24/2013 6:52:39 AM PDT by Colonel_Flagg (Blather. Reince. Repeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

This is going to be heard in a day or two before they recess for the summer?


42 posted on 06/24/2013 7:09:29 AM PDT by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lurking Libertarian; JDW11235; Clairity; TheOldLady; Spacetrucker; Art in Idaho; GregNH; ...
SCOTUS remands Fisher v. University of Texas back to the appeals court. So no ruling on affirmative action. This case is still alive and will likely return to SCOTUS.
45 posted on 06/24/2013 7:22:00 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lurking Libertarian; JDW11235; Clairity; TheOldLady; Spacetrucker; Art in Idaho; GregNH; ...
No decisions today on Shelby County v. Holder, Hollingsworth v. Perry, or United States v. Windsor. Those will likely be on Tuesday or Wednesday.
47 posted on 06/24/2013 7:30:55 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson