Replies

Only an OBOT or ConcernedFreeper cares about how, when and why Obama’s Certificate of Naturalization was viewed, copied, or delivered. These are the questions a defense lawyer would use to discredit the incriminating evidence and protect Obama.

The best answer a rebuttal witness can provide to an OBOT or ConcernedFreeper is: “I don’t recall.”

At trial, the rebuttal witness can carefully explain how, when and why they were able to legally obtain a copy of Obama’s Certificate of Naturalization. Obama provided copies of his COLB to select reporters and denied other reporters the opportunity to examine the certified copy. An immigrant can provide a copy of his/her Certificate of Naturalization if they choose. Doing so, waives their right to privacy.

Providing a copy of the evidence to an attorney to discuss legal issues is not a violation of Obama’s privacy. He waived his right to privacy when he gave it to me. I’m protected by attorney-client privilege as I sought legal advice from licensed attorney, Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. I can provide any documents I think are relevant to a legal issue to a licensed attorney without adverse consequence.

Well, what would Orly think of the information being spread by her client (you) all over FR?

Information that should be protected by the attorney client privilege , hmm?

Why don’t you keep the info that you saw a CLN and sent docs to Orly....

UNDER YOUR HAT? ???

David, LucyT, cold case posse supporter, seizethecarp, theoldlady:

Pinging all y’all to this, need your opinion on someone that has an attorney client relationship (in this case Sven with Orly) spreading his info, info that he has given to his attorney ( in this case sven gave info to orly about 0’s immigration docs) all over FR and elsewhere.

An immigrant can provide a copy of his/her Certificate of Naturalization if they choose. Doing so, waives their right to privacy.

Providing a copy of the evidence to an attorney to discuss legal issues is not a violation of Obama’s privacy. He waived his right to privacy when he gave it to me.

I smell more bullshit. Your story changed again. Now you say that 0bama gave you a copy. If he really did, then you would be giving it to every law enforcement agency in the land and posting it for all to see...

...so you could be famous on national TV ;-)

You must be one of those OBOTs or ConcernedFreepers.

Cold case Posse supporter, seizethecarp, ray76,LucyT, theoldlady,

Pinging all y’all to this one.... showing the change in the story.

Sven,

the quote below from your post is NOT part of the example; in it you say

1) 0 GAVE you a copy of his cert of naturalization

Now its gone from

“I saw a copy of 0’s CLN” (your post #16 in the link in post #122 )

“I have a copy of 0’s cert of naturalization that I got legally because 0 gave me a copy” as stated below:

“.... Providing a copy of the evidence to an attorney to discuss legal issues is not a violation of Obama’s privacy. He waived his right to privacy when he gave it to me. I’m protected by attorney-client privilege as I sought legal advice from licensed attorney,Dr. Orly Taitz,Esq. I can provide any documents I think are relevant to a legal issue to a licensed attorney without adverse consequence.

132 posted on Fri Jul 05 2013 09:56:23 GMT-0500 (CDT) by SvenMagnussen (1983 ... the year Obama became a naturalized U.S. citizen.) [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies | Report Abuse]