Replies

I have written on this subject here before and bares repeating. The best argument for this is, if a law enforcement agent needs a full auto M-4 and 4 to 6 magazines of the 30 round type because of the threats he or she faces then John Q Public needs the same. What threats does mister agent face that we in the public don’t (out side of those they create). If those threats don’t exist than why does mister agent need them? We in the public face everything day in and out for longer periods of time than any LEO. A weapon carried by the agent is for personal protection not your protection. So with with that said and we being denied the same who do you think it is they are afraid of? You first answer is RIGHT.

Am glad to see you are writing of this situation facing law abiding citizens. Yes, law abiding citizens deserve the same protections as law enforcement and federal officials. There could be an unusual circumstance develop because of current policies being implemented by misguided politicians that would demand the citizenry have equal protection from unforeseen extremists with fully automatic weaponry.

Thank You for writing on this topic. This is a topic near and dear to me. Our communities deserve to be free not bound by irrational laws should a time arise when the necessity exists for the citizenry to be better armed, and I perceive that time could be just around the corner. God only knows what is in store ... I prefer Americans Be Prepared. Guess Being Prepared is against the law though.