[tacticalogic]

Sorry, I meant to say the claimed occurance of the flood pre-dates the advent of the dating methods. The methods obviously had not been developed and the instruments to do the measurements had not been invented before the flood, yet you seem perfectly comfortable telling people those methods worked better after the flood, as if we have records those methods being used both before and after.

This is sociopathic to me - no sense of what is truth and what is fabrication, no standards that apply equally to both sides, no conscience.

[USS Johnston]

Sorry, I meant to say the claimed occurance of the flood pre-dates the advent of the dating methods. The methods obviously had not been developed and the instruments to do the measurements had not been invented before the flood, yet you seem perfectly comfortable telling people those methods worked better after the flood, as if we have records those methods being used both before and after.

Sorry. You're presuming to read my mind while stating the obvious -- that any scientific instruments or methodology was available before the flood. OR for the next thousands of years until Man became a Genius and Science a Religion.

For practical purposes, ONLY recorded history is the source of any claimed "age" -- as per the account of Moses etal. in Scripture as well as Egyptian accounts (that are fairly consistent with the Bible.) That said, there are no verified archeological datings predating @3000 BC. So what did they have? Besides that? Tree rings.

By 1862 scientist named Thompson proclaimed the earth's age at 20 million years. In 1897 he DOUBLED the age to 40 mil. Science nodded. "Science" again moved the goalpost just two years later to 90 mil. By 1921 Science finally hit the sweet spot: a nice round ONE billion years. After that "Science" kept jacking up the age until ot's reached FIVE billlion. ALL the while, perpetrating the lies of "Evolution," TEACHING Evolution, creating fake "ancient man" skulls and bones and displaying them at museums around the world.

This is sociopathic to me - no sense of what is truth and what is fabrication, no standards that apply equally to both sides, no conscience.

Again -- IF you're able to extricate yourself from your high horse (or Unicorn), what or who are YOUR "standards" of both "truth" and "scientific proof"? And I'll try not to ridicule you personally, or your own motives and agenda.