If We started off with a dog that had the DNA code to give say; black, brown, red, white, or other colors. After we kept picking the brown ones, won’t we eventually had dogs that had lost the code for black, white, red, or any other color? We did not get more DNA code or information. We actually LOST information. Do not Evolutionists claim that all the different breeds of dogs are evidence that dogs can evolve and gain new DNA code?
But In fact, the different breeds of dogs prove just the opposite, since new DNA information is never added.
In truth, the different varieties of dogs prove to us that In nature, the Law of Biogenesis says that all animals come from other animals of their own kind.
They have not been giving birth to something other than a dog or cat.
K.Butte
But In fact, the different breeds of dogs prove just the opposite, since new DNA information is never added.
In truth, the different varieties of dogs prove to us that In nature, the Law of Biogenesis says that all animals come from other animals of their own kind. They have not been giving birth to something other than a dog or cat.
Irrefutable truths. Will someone, anyone who supports "evolution" please cite science's proof of DNA transmutation of ANY newly created or "transitional creature"?
Wait...Hey! Didn't Horton hatch an egg? :-) Hmmm...
For the record, the great halls of "Science" insisted 'Piltdown Man' was an actual "Missing Evolutionary Link" for about 40 years, taught in schools, and displayed in museums...insisting it was "millions of years old" -- before the Hoax was finally exposed.
That's a hypothesis, certainly. The next thing you do is start trying to confirm that hypothesis. As I said above, find the dog with both forms of the size gene.
They have not been giving birth to something other than a dog or cat.
This is, really, a meaningless statement. First of all, nobody ever claimed that an organism would give birth to something that was of a different species. (That would go a long way toward disproving evolution, in fact.) Second, what's a "dog"? How much would something have to change before you weren't willing to call it a dog anymore? Remember that it would be changing into something new, not something you're already familiar with.
won’t we eventually had dogs that had lost the code for black, white, red, or any other color?
Watched a program on the Ice Age and after “millions” of years of large mastodons, the final refuge was an island off Siberia where the last of the mastodons were half the size of the former. Some would say that nutrition might have been the cause but it still takes some incredible genetic programing to respond to that outside factor.
Our young friend here has grown up with the word mutation. Seen many movies where radiation has changed something. Mutation are fatal in a complex system. He hears about microbes that are resistant to penicillin and thinks that is evolution, something new. He doesn’t understand it is survival of the microbe that is already resistant.
So the answer to your original thought is both are probably true, we do lose some but there is also this is amazing system that retains it, but hidden away.
But of course this would imply that there is something greater than man and we don’t want to hear that.