Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Arm_Bears

LOL!

NO. It was a constitutional issue.


35 posted on 06/19/2013 5:21:45 PM PDT by SatinDoll (NATURAL BORN CITZEN: BORN IN THE USA OF CITIZEN PARENTS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: SatinDoll

Which explains why the abolition movement was born in, and vigorously supported by, the nation’s churches (i.e., Christians) at the time.


76 posted on 06/20/2013 4:53:39 AM PDT by Arm_Bears (Refuse; Resist; Rebel; Revolt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: SatinDoll

“NO. It was a constitutional issue.”

Why can’t it be both a social AND constitutional issue? Why do you think the two are mutually exclusive?

Certainly many abolitionist preachers saw it as a social issue and preached it from the pulpit. In the end, however, the constitution had to be changed, so the issue was a constitutional one in that regard. Seems like some of both to me.


94 posted on 06/20/2013 10:52:06 AM PDT by Owl558 (Those who remember George Santayana are doomed to repeat him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson