Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

YouTube:Sukhoi Su-35 Paris Air Show 2013 Flight Demonstration
YouTube ^ | June 17, 2013 | Staff

Posted on 06/19/2013 11:51:25 AM PDT by lbryce

Wikipedia:Sukhoi SU-35-Flanker-E

The Sukhoi Su-35 (Russian: Сухой Су-35; NATO reporting name: Flanker-E) is designation of two different heavily-upgraded derivatives of the Su-27 'Flanker'. Both are single-seat, twin-engine supermaneuverable multirole fighters, designed by Sukhoi and built by Komsomolsk-on-Amur Aircraft Production Association (KnAAPO).

The first variant was designed during the 1980s, when Sukhoi was looking to upgrade its high-performance Su-27, and was initially known as the Su-27M. Later re-designated Su-35, this derivative incorporates aerodynamic refinements to increase manoeuvrability, enhanced avionics, longer range, and a more powerful engine. The first Su-35 prototype, converted from a Su-27, made its maiden flight in June 1988. More than a dozen of these were built with some used by the Russian Knights aerobatic demonstration team. The first Su-35 design was later modified into the Su-37 with thrust-vectoring engines and used as a technology demonstrator. A sole Su-35UB two-seat trainer was built in the late 1990s that, despite its name, shares a strong resemblance to the Su-30MK family.

In 2003, Sukhoi embarked on a second modernization of the Su-27 to produce what the company calls a 4++ generation fighter that would serve as an interim fighter prior to the arrival of the Sukhoi PAK FA. This derivative incorporates a reinforced airframe, improved avionics and radar, thrust-vectoring engines, and a reduced radar signature from the front, while omitting the canards and air brake. In 2008 the revamped variant, erroneously dubbed the Su-35BM by the media, started its flight test programme that involved four prototypes, one of which was lost in 2009.

The Russian Air Force has ordered 48 production units, designated Su-35S, of the newly-revamped Su-35. Both Su-35 models have been offered to many countries, including Brazil, China, India and South Korea, but so far have not attracted any export orders. Sukhoi originally projected that it would export more than 160 units of the second modernized Su-35 worldwide


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: russia; stealthfighter; su35; sukhoi; sukhosu35
What can I, a die hard jingoistic American military sycophant say, about Russia's entry in the stealth jet fighter competition, as the Sukhoi SU-35 takes flight at the Paris Air Show 2013 to seemingly break the laws of aerodynamics?

I'll leave the judgement up to the viewer to determine its air-worthiness versus America's best and just make two simple comments. Firstly, nobody died, the aircraft didn't crash. Secondly, it made no attempt to launch itself to considerable height in near 90 degree angle like the F-22 or F-35 proving itself capable of. Enjoy the flight.

1 posted on 06/19/2013 11:51:25 AM PDT by lbryce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lbryce

No stealth means not a 4++ generation fighter. Speed/power and stealth is the most dire of attributes. Targeting computers a close second. This thing is pretty and probably fun to fly but a F-15, F-22, and maybe a F-18, with our pilots would make short work of it.


2 posted on 06/19/2013 12:00:18 PM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Looked like a joy ride to me.


3 posted on 06/19/2013 12:01:56 PM PDT by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

I bet with those large vertical stabilizers and no real stealth features that this thing lights up on radar like a flashbulb in a dark room. And even a marginally effective sidewinder should give a good growl when it sees those ABs light up. I could be wrong, but I would rather not have to employ all of these terrific maneuvers just avoid incoming threats.


4 posted on 06/19/2013 12:03:07 PM PDT by SPI-Man (I am root)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head; Stonewall Jackson

Stealthy?


5 posted on 06/19/2013 12:18:30 PM PDT by SLB (23rd Artillery Group, Republic of South Vietnam, Aug 1970 - Aug 1971.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Raptor bait.


6 posted on 06/19/2013 12:23:33 PM PDT by southernerwithanattitude (New and Improved Redneck!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
Did anyone notice the vortex lift going on aft and on top of the LEX's ( Leading Edge Extensions)?

I'd love to see how slow they could land this thing. They didn't show that. If it was STOL with a rugged landing gear for off airport, i.e. road use as in the old Soviet and Saab Viggen model that would be cool. All that maneuverability would be great for landing in unimproved strips, but I am not sure this airplane is the A-10 replacement we are looking for...

7 posted on 06/19/2013 12:29:30 PM PDT by taildragger (( Tighten the 5 point harness and brace for Impact Freepers, ya know it's coming..... ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taildragger

The only replacement for an old A-10 is a new A-10, or maybe some new A-1E spads.


8 posted on 06/19/2013 1:34:48 PM PDT by Sergio (An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

How about a cost/benefit analysis someone? Looks like you could buy 4 or 5 SU-35s or one F-22. That, if correct, means you had better have a 5:1 or better kill ratio at bottom line. Anyone have accurate figures?


9 posted on 06/19/2013 1:55:19 PM PDT by Temujinshordes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
I vaguely remember an old article from when I was a kid by Jimmy Breslin where he recommended that we fight the newer fighter planes from the then USSR with Sopwith Camels. He said they were so slow they couldn't be caught or targeted. Funny piece.
10 posted on 06/19/2013 2:26:43 PM PDT by Cyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Temujinshordes

>>>>How about a cost/benefit analysis someone? Looks like you could buy 4 or 5 SU-35s or one F-22. That, if correct, means you had better have a 5:1 or better kill ratio at bottom line. Anyone have accurate figures?<<<<

Su-35 is not cheap by all means. AFAIK the Chinese negotiates to get it at $85 million a piece.


11 posted on 06/19/2013 9:55:38 PM PDT by cunning_fish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson