Replies

The NTSB report isn’t a “media coverup”. It makes sense and is well researched.

The 9/11 Trufer mentality is based on a lack of facts, strawman arguments and ignoring actual facts. How many “eye witnesses” and internet experts said that “controlled Demolition” brought down the towers on 9/11, even after we watched it all on live TV?

The NTSB report has actual facts and they point directly to the center fuel tank exploding.

Arguments that “jet fuel can’t explode” or ‘Planes can’t fly with their noses torn off” because some internet expert says so is 9/11 Trufer think.

747-131F N53111 proves 747’s can crash when their fuel tanks explode, Since I work for the manufacturer, I know JT9d engines will continue to run at full thottle, even in the Cockpit of the plane is torn away and from my small scale tests, I know a 747-100/-200 will continue to fly in a straight line and not tumble, even with its nose torn off to the wing root.

>> “The NTSB report has actual facts and they point directly to the center fuel tank exploding.” <<

.
They have vastly more evidence showing rocket fuel components on the entire interior of the plane.

Silverstein, who leased the WTC complex at the time, stated to the press that bldg. seven was 'pulled'. Pulled is euphemistic speak for controlled demolition. The only question regarding blgd seven is what sort of controlled demolition. That blgd collapsed five hours after the first tower was struck by the hijacked airline. How long do you think it takes to set the exact right chrges to drop a 47 story bldg. in such a way that it implodes perfectly without explelling furnishings at super sonic speed from the collapsing structure?

Dragging the 'trufer' crap into this thread reveals your agenda, freak.