No, if you are going to continue promoting Santorum, then Santorum needs to be discussed, and supporting Specter all the way into 2010 and his switching to the democrat party, is most definitely relevant.
RE: No, if you are going to continue promoting Santorum
Excuse me? This is an article from the National Review. PERIOD. It simply says what he’s doing NOW. There’s no promotion there.
I am simply saying that IF ( and that’s a big IF ) he wins the GOP nomination. I WILL vote for him over whoever the Democrat is without hesitation.
You’re well within your rights not to vote for him.
Now, If you want to discuss Arlen Specter, fine, but please don’t call me weird for mentioning what he espoused in 2011 ( unless you have shown that he has changed today ).
So did GW and it was for the sole purpose of maintaining control of Supreme Court nominations. You know that and yet you pound this forum endlessly with the same tripe.
The fact that Specter turned traitor was not Santorum's fault. Remember when we all thought that Snarlin Arlen would get to the bottom of Waco and Ruby Ridge?