Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: henkster

Seems the issue is that your silence IN CONTEXT can be used to infer, a la:

Q: “Did you do A?”
A: “No.”
Q: “Did you do B?”
A: “No.”
Q: “Did you do C?”
A: “No.”
Q: “Did you do D?”
A: “No.”
...
Q: “Did you do X?”
A: “No.”
Q: “Did you do Y?”
A: [silence]
Q: “Did you do Z?”
A: “No.”

Yeah, he did Y.


50 posted on 06/17/2013 1:16:48 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (Making good people helpless doesn't make bad people harmless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: ctdonath2

Perhaps, but the burden of proof should still on the court that you did Y. Your silence should not be able to be used against you.


56 posted on 06/17/2013 1:32:34 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson