It isn't remarkable that a judiciary should be in agreement regarding what is ordinary law, it is only remarkable when they are in disagreement regarding what is ordinary law. 52% is not much above half, and is, in any case, a statistical (not comprehensive) analysis of the available data.
You are fond of citing numbers as proof of something though.
“You are fond of citing numbers as proof of something though.”
Yes indeed, I plead guilty. However on this thread it was YOU who first brought up the numbers of Justices on each side of this decision.