Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: abb

The construction that Washington, D.C., is bringing to the 4th Amendment is that any “reasonable” search is o.k., but unreasonable ones require a warrant. Furthermore, that a warrant is required to search and seize particular persons and conversations, etc., while massive searches of everybody of everything they say or write or transact, is o.k.

Clearly, the warrant is the method by which the reasonableness of the search is to be guaranteed. That is, the executive needs to go to a judge for the warrant. And, that warrant has to specify the particular person or thing to be searched and seized. No blanket searches and seizures.


11 posted on 06/17/2013 3:24:11 AM PDT by Redmen4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Redmen4ever

Bump!


50 posted on 06/17/2013 5:57:59 AM PDT by Texas Fossil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson