Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Conserev1

To bad the South didn’t have a scorched earth policy too. The South was to weak to make it very far into the North. But a good fantasy would be burning New York and DC to the ground. It would be such fun reading how it was the burned by vacating troops and how war is hell just get over it we won so shut up with the truth. I would love to see the same slough off of history but going the other way.


81 posted on 06/16/2013 4:27:35 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: central_va
But a good fantasy would be burning New York and DC to the ground.

They tried: Link. But being Confederate agents, stupid, and inept in that order their attempt failed.

88 posted on 06/16/2013 4:46:02 AM PDT by 0.E.O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

To: central_va
To bad the South didn’t have a scorched earth policy too. The South was to weak to make it very far into the North. But a good fantasy would be burning New York and DC to the ground. It would be such fun reading how it was the burned by vacating troops and how war is hell just get over it we won so shut up with the truth. I would love to see the same slough off of history but going the other way.

Salting the earth and burning Northern cities would have been directly contrary to the war aims of the South.

The South wanted to establish itself as an independent, sovereign nation. It knew that following any victory it would have to share a LOOOOONG border with the independent, sovereign nation it had just defeated in winning that independence. The Southern leaders (particularly the senior Generals) knew this and were trying to balance winning with preventing as much post-war bitterness and animosity as possible. That's why Lee and other Southern generals at least put on the appearance of being magnanimous (and in many cases they were magnanimous).

The North wanted to bring the South back into the Union and do so under circumstances where it would never want to leave again. Yes, Lincoln was genuine with his "Charity towards all, malice towards none" statement and philosophy, but it was predicated upon the South first being unequivocally (and brutally) defeated. The theory being that you pound your enemy into the rubble - making sure they know that they have LOST - and THEN extend the helping hand of friendship to help them get back up on their feet. The bad policies of Reconstruction and later the Treaty of Versailles show the wrong way to do this. The continued military pacifism of Japan and Germany following WWII show the right way to do this. IMHO.
93 posted on 06/16/2013 5:28:08 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

To: central_va
To bad the South didn’t have a scorched earth policy too. The South was to weak to make it very far into the North. But a good fantasy would be burning New York and DC to the ground.

The Confederates did indeed try to burn New York to the ground. And just like everything else they tried, they failed.

107 posted on 06/16/2013 9:24:09 AM PDT by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson