Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rockrr

I don’t think that anyone here said that no one could secede - just that they way the slavers tried to do it wasn’t jake.

//////////////////////

Interesting thought.

What — in your view — would have made their attempt at secession “jake?”


143 posted on 06/16/2013 6:28:54 PM PDT by man_in_tx (Blowback (Faithfully farting twowards Mecca five times daily).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]


To: man_in_tx

Had they sought mutuality within their brother states.


149 posted on 06/16/2013 6:34:38 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]

To: man_in_tx

Controversies between the states, or between the states and the federal government are to be resolved with the supreme court as original jurisdiction, per Article 3 of the Constitution.

The slave states did not write up their grievances, file a court case seeking legal resolution, as would be constitutional, nor did they introduce a bill into congress, nor did they try to have the congress submit an amendment to the constitution. Any of those approaches would have been legal. They tried none of them.


245 posted on 06/23/2013 1:18:28 AM PDT by donmeaker (Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson